<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My Suction Luer Lock]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">My individual changed construction</p>
<p dir="auto">/FBRC-Redox-FLOW-Batterie/Fotos Projekt/IMG_7768.JPG</p>
<p dir="auto">As I had to change the tubes in my pumps (they were the wrong tube type),(thanks <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/sepi" aria-label="Profile: sepi">@<bdi>sepi</bdi></a>) I also changed the connectors to Luer Lock .<br />
Therefore it was necessary to enlarge the boreholes in the endplates and in the brass-plates to 10.5 mm to get the female Luer Lock part through.<br />
And I changed my construction to sucking from the cells.</p>
<p dir="auto">Some other thoughts:<br />
<a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/danielfp248" aria-label="Profile: danielfp248">@<bdi>danielfp248</bdi></a> In your picture of 08.01.26 you put the pump for suction on the lower side of the cell, why?<br />
In my opinion it would be better to connect the pump upper side to avoid air in the system as I did in my setup.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kirk" aria-label="Profile: kirk">@<bdi>kirk</bdi></a><br />
your new approach for the test cell seems veri interesting. But for getting reproducible resultants the flow through the cell should be down to up, but not horizontal (how much would be air isolating in the chamber when changing parts?)</p>
<p dir="auto">I do not have an idea for a reasonable physical layout for a really simple change of the test-chamber, but I will think over.</p>
<p dir="auto">Printing materials I have used:<br />
Parts not in contact with chemicals: PETG, works very well<br />
PP: My 1st: (Yousu),all surfaces o.k, but all barbed broke. 2nd: Innovatefil  PP GF worked very well, but the upper surface was rough, tests will come.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fbrc.nodebb.com/topic/60/my-suction-luer-lock</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 20:52:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fbrc.nodebb.com/topic/60.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:45:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Suction Luer Lock on Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:58:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Very nice work <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/doho" aria-label="Profile: doho">@<bdi>doho</bdi></a> ! It's great to see your setup.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/doho" aria-label="Profile: doho">@<bdi>doho</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/610">My Suction Luer Lock</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">But for getting reproducible resultants the flow through the cell should be down to up, but not horizontal (how much would be air isolating in the chamber when changing parts?)</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is a good point, from what I've seen in other applications cells should generally clear air/produced gases by flowing against gravity from bottom to top, that is still possible with the new setup but the tubing from the pump outlet to cell inlet would have to be slightly longer. In my jig redesign I'll take this into account when writing the documentation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/617</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/617</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kirk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:58:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Suction Luer Lock on Fri, 20 Feb 2026 10:56:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for sharing your pictures! It always makes us very happy to see anyone reproducing the kit independently.</p>
<p dir="auto">You can see my current setup below:</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1771584465302-cell_feb2026-resized.jpg" alt="cell_Feb2026.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">I am testing the double reservoir with spill-over communication (that's why the reservoirs look different and are at the center). My pumps are connected in a suction configuration and they enter and exit the cell on their sides. When you have pumps in a push-through configuration having the flow going from bottom to top is important to push air out, but when you suck through the cell the vacuum will push all air out and fill the entire cavity, almost regardless of how you pump. I haven't seen any air being trapped there (no bubbles are evident when shaking or moving the cell so that the flow is in either direction).</p>
<p dir="auto">As you can see I have changed some connections to luer locks, except the connections for the pumps. I however like how you've made them ALL luer locks, much simpler to disassemble.</p>
<p dir="auto">As you can see I'm also testing the new clamp-compatible end-plates and clamp. This works SO much easier than the screws, since the compression is centered I am also experiencing fewer problems with the cell and slightly better energy efficiencies since the felt compression seems to be more uniform. Opening and closing this cell is a breeze compared to the screws. I used PLA with 80% infill to print the end plates but I am sure PETG will work great too.</p>
<p dir="auto">About the PP, it is a bit tricky to find the PP and printer settings that work best for water tight results. I am using the Ivor white PP from smart 3d, which has worked well on the prusa core one. In any case, let me know if there's anything I can help you with.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/612</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/612</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[danielfp248]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 10:56:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Suction Luer Lock on Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:55:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm not sure, but hopefully my foto will arrive (it is now only 1,4MB instead of 4GB)<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1771580642845-3cedc08f-a81f-4145-b0a5-0bfeabe092b4-img_7771-klein-resized.jpg" alt="IMG_7771 klein.JPG" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/611</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fbrc.nodebb.com/post/611</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[doho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:55:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>