Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Logo that says

Flow Battery Research Collective

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Designing the large-format cell

Designing the large-format cell

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
41 Posts 6 Posters 865 Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kirkK Offline
    kirkK Offline
    kirk
    wrote last edited by kirk
    #41

    Some preliminary CFD of the simplified flow frame (U in m/s and P in Pa if I understand OpenFOAM correctly)

    Conditions

    • 4 L/min volumetric flowrate through one half-cell, inlet is on the top left, outlet on the lower right.
    • Ambient pressure on cell outlet
    • No-slip wall
    • File containing CAD and CFD simulation setup is here
      Blue is inlet, red outlet, pink is porous zone
      cceeeb36-5eea-4e11-adee-ff8c03f55cae-image.png !

    Close-up of mesh:
    af0c16c7-24b6-474c-bf65-bf4cccd61050-image.png

    Flow Distribution (m/s)

    image.png

    Pletcher and Walsh say a range of 0.05-0.4 m/s linear velocity is a good design range for electrolyte flow, if I apply a smaller range for velocity with 0.05 m/s as the upper limit, we see which areas in red have sufficient flow and where the dead zones are (in the corners, predictably)

    395df286-d6cc-4162-af28-0d8eec5563e2-image.png

    Pressure Drop (Pa)

    5d5305d8-f560-4c89-8692-df78c18ab27a-image.png

    Big Caveat

    Still need to calculate the Darcy-Forchheimer coefficients to do the porous zone simulation in the graphite felt, right now I am using the default values, which are almost certainly not correct. If anyone feels like finding that data (https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/DarcyForchheimer). I think Antoni Forner-Cuenca's group has measured a lot on this recently. This could change the results quite a bit as far as flow distribution and pressure drop. I've mostly so far just been getting familiar with the simulation pipeline in FreeCAD --> CfdOF --> OpenFOAM --> ParaView.

    Design is far from final, and I'm probably doing the CFD incorrectly, BUT it prints and doesn't leak! We will keep optimizing the flow frame later.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    4

    Online

    62

    Users

    33

    Topics

    364

    Posts
    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups