Flow Battery Research Collective

Ah, in the FAQ ... Yes, was thinking wrong from other and not so good sources.

@sepi Unless you are very experienced soldering small components I would suggest not doing this. Some of the expensive components are tiny and easy to damage, either by overheating or by soldering multiple legs together and causing shorts. I tried soldering my own mystat 3 times (without success) before I got my first working one from pcbway. I am however, not good at all at soldering.

My latest quote is 315$ with assembly included by PCBWay. That's expensive but not prohibitive. Thanks for the input!

I'm no expert ether. We used quick setting plaster a lot in construction for repairs on a lot of things and now they have a "wood epoxy" which is an epoxy for wood repairs. You have a thing epoxy you brush on onto wood which provides a good bonding surface for dry rotted wood and then you mix an epoxy that works more like the quick setting plaster and creates a strong enough repair that you can nail it. These plasters and epoxies could be formed or poured to create a nice mold. For the quickset we could build up an area, then carve and shape it before it fully set. The surface is very smooth and with a spray sealer of some kind should be even better for molds. A quick look into casting, it looks like the most common is using silicon for making the mold. Yes it lets you do detail, but it is also soft and flexible. Not good for making thin plates without warpage.

Here is an updated version! https://spectra.video/w/nJ8XNYu1MXNPSDLKV3KVTh

Updates from @danielfp@chemisting.com during today's meeting: I started a test with 2M KI, 1M ZnCl2, 2M NH4Cl, 5% Trieg with Daramic and felt on both sides. Going to charge to 1.6V at 10mA/cm2, see if it makes any difference regarding stability with Trieg on subsequent cycles. I did one cycle at 10mA/cm2, charged to around 240mAh (noticed a dip indicating start of solid I2 buildup, so cut it there), discharged 180mAh. I am now charging to 150mAh at 30mA/cm2, normally I would see drops in capacity with cycling with Trieg at this level, we'll see if they happen. [image: 1747325869007-57810618-3e33-4f12-ad81-bc93fc620bcd-image.png] Seems to be stable now at 30mA/cm2. I will leave it cycling here longer, see if it starts decaying. [image: 1747325889390-778d48dc-3d94-4012-9de2-a0c45a4727b0-image.png] ok, went for 9 cycles with no issues at all. I am now going to cycle it to 1.65V, to the Nernst limit, see if it continues working equally well. Charging to 1.65V showed the weird start for the discharge curve, although with no apparent deterioration of the cycle characteristics after the first cycle. No evidence for solid iodine formation was present, so the solution is very well behaved. [image: 1747325914186-cc5413ce-ad2d-4ae5-b64d-ed8939f213cf-image.png] Test at 15mA/cm2 of the same cell. Some deterioration is now evident, charging to 1.55 V [image: 1747325934195-2dbc77b1-de09-4492-a3e2-5997e2517c81-image.png]

@gus @SamAuc ABS may work with an all-copper chemistry!

Hi Otmar! I think it would be helpful to see a rough schedule of the workshop and time allocations per topic/activity - then it would be easier to give feedback for the site, based on specifics of the activity the site is meant to complement!

Cloning the https://codeberg.org/FBRC/RFB-dev-kit repository, opening the assembly in FreeCAD, fixing part of it, then pushing the changes with VSCodium. As part of the Flow Battery Research Collective project at https://fbrc.dev 0:00 Cloning repository 3:29 Opening assembly file 4:09 Fixing the cell assembly 20:20 Pushing changes to repository

Hi Otmar, welcome to FBRC and the project, looking forward to working with you!

@kirk said in How should we control the centrifugal pumps? TRIAC/thyristor etc? Need help from controls/electrical people: It seems to work! At least enough for testing purposes. Here is a video: https://spectra.video/w/8xipM8aXnBkDXnu4kkRpqT Here is the code for this test: https://codeberg.org/FBRC/RFB-test-cell/src/commit/d10834bc7dd67736e708c9a33832a5602ab3ca28/firmware/FlowrateRampTest.ino

Nice work, Daniel. I am thinking of plumbing solutions to the imbalance issue: From A review of all-vanadium redox flow battery durability: After studying the capacity fade for mixed acid electrolyte, UET [154] found that, during long‐term operation, the ratio of catholyte and anolyte concentration remained constant: 1.3:1. Based on this finding, they designed an overflow system with different volume (volume ratio: 1.3:1) anolyte and catholyte tanks, in which the volume ratio and total vanadium were kept constant. With the new design, the VRFB achieved long term capacity and efficiency stability. However, this design is only valid for the mixed acid electrolyte system. Recently, Wang et al [152] developed an electrolyte reflow method to solve the electrolyte imbalance issue for the sulfuric acidvanadium electrolyte system. Figure 10 shows the schematic of their method; without reflow, eventually all of the anolyte will move to the catholyte tank, while with reflow, the anolyte tank will always contain some electrolyte. Similar to the UET method, the volume ratio of catholyte to anolyte is a key parameter affecting the capacity stability and is highly dependent on the operating current density. Cycle life and total capacity were all improved with the reflow method. There is also Capacity balancing for vanadium redox flow batteries through electrolyte overflow but it was retracted - they think they accidentally had a pinhole in their membrane for the test. But they did build a real overflow system: [image: 1739741378711-aceadcdb-fb4d-4387-b6c6-9b95a79cc192-image.png]

That's great! Do you have a link to one or know where we could procure one to test?

Stephen Hawes of Opulo has compiled some of their tools here: https://midscale.io/docs The AutoBOM one seems to be based on those workflows above and looks pretty interesting

Reading the posts about the different pump designs, it makes more sense. More background reading to do. TY